This week, your TV lineup is about to get a serious upgrade—but here’s where it gets intriguing: Kenneth Branagh’s highly anticipated drama about Boris Johnson is finally hitting Australian screens, and it’s bound to spark conversations. Plus, Ryan Murphy’s take on the tragic romance of John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette promises to tug at your heartstrings. But here’s where it gets controversial: Is this the kind of storytelling we need right now, or are we romanticizing the past at the expense of pressing current issues? Let’s dive in.
If you’re ready to explore these shows and more, here’s a deal that’s hard to ignore: For just $1 a week for the first 4 weeks ($4 minimum cost), you can unlock unlimited access to expert news, exclusive commentary, and a digital version of today’s paper. After that, it’s $44 every 4 weeks—no lock-in contract required. And this is the part most people miss: You also get complimentary access to The Wall Street Journal, daily puzzles, and subscriber-only newsletters. Want to save more? Lock in $8 a week for the first 12 months ($416 minimum cost), billed as $32 every 4 weeks, and keep the perks rolling.
With full digital access, you’ll swipe through the digital newspaper, archives, and liftouts like a pro. Stay ahead with exclusive news emails, sharpen your mind with daily crosswords and Sudoku, and enjoy the trusted voices of The Australian’s world-class journalists. But here’s the real question: In an era of endless content, are we prioritizing quality over quantity? Think about it.
Meet the journalists behind the stories: Vesna Poljak, with over 20 years in business journalism, dissects the investment world with precision. Hedley Thomas, an eight-time Walkley winner, uncovers corruption and legal dramas in his true crime podcasts. Claire Harvey, a digital storytelling pioneer, leads The Australian’s editorial team. Caroline Overington, a literary powerhouse, champions writers while topping charts with her thrillers. And Simon Benson, an award-winning political editor, cuts through the noise in national affairs. Controversial take: Do these journalists represent the full spectrum of voices, or is there room for more diverse perspectives? Weigh in below.
Whether you’re here for the shows, the news, or the debate, one thing’s clear: This week is packed with content that’s as thought-provoking as it is entertaining. What’s your take? Agree, disagree, or somewhere in between? Let’s hear it in the comments!
